Skip to content

Month: January 2024

Are Double Digit Cap Rates on the Horizon in NYC for Rent Stabilized Owners Choosing to Sell?

It finally happened—a nearly double digit capitalization rate on a recent multi-family trade in NYC. Two contiguous Upper Manhattan properties recently traded for $5.8 million (or $8.3 million less than the $14.1 million purchase price in 2017) representing a 9% cap rate, according to press reports. The other metrics are equally astonishing: $120 price per sq. ft., 5.7x gross rent multiple and approximately $95,000 per unit.

The reason for the heavy discount is clear to anyone following the space as the June 2019 rent laws (a.k.a. HSTPA) radically turned valuations both upside-down and inside-out for rent stabilized properties. Still, these metrics are disconcerting and potentially signal more trouble ahead for rent stabilized property owners. Don’t blame it on poor management either: ownership was no neophyte. The seller is a third generation owner/operator with a career that spans more than 30 years and includes the purchase, development and management of more than 150 properties in NYC, New Jersey and Florida, according to his website.

Of course, there could be more to the story that neither press reports nor public records are picking up, but what are your thoughts, do you expect cap rates to continue to climb for this asset class? What about the location of the assets, how much would it have mattered from a cap rate perspective if the buildings were south of 96th Street in Manhattan or in a lesser Bronx location?   

Website Source:
Wexcor Capital pays $5.8M to Barberry Rose for two walkups in Washington Heights. (2024, January 11). PincusCo. https://www.pincusco.com/wexcor-capital-pays-5-8m-to-barberry-rose-for-two-walkups-in-washington-heights/

Wexcor Capital Purchases Washington Heights Apartment Building For $5.8M – Mann Report. (2024, January 3). https://www.mannpublications.com/mannreport/2024/01/03/wexcor-capital-purchases-washington-heights-apartment-building-for-5-8m/
1
Leave a Comment

Say It Isn’t So…A Landlord Friendly Legislative Proposal Coming Out of Albany

They say good things come to those who wait and perhaps the wait is over for NYC landlords and tenants.

Much of this blog has focused on the ineptitude, incompetence and questionable motives of NY State’s legislators when it comes to housing policy. And the criticism has no doubt been well deserved. It turns out, however, that there is reason for hope with the under-the-radar proposal introduced last year, clumsily referred to as the “Local Regulated Housing Restoration Adjustment.” Though just in the initial stages of the arduous path to becoming law, this measure has been described as a rent reset for vacant rent-stabilized apartments.

To refresh, current law requires rent stabilized units to remain at the legal rent upon tenant turnover. The only permitted rental Increases for rent stabilized apartments are set annually by the city’s Rent Guidelines Board (often less than 3% per year). The new proposal would allow a rental reset for those units that become vacant after being continuously occupied for ten (10) or more years and after being renovated. The new legal regulated rent would be the amount agreed to by the owner and that first new tenant.

The proposal, if passed, would be a meaningful step in the right direction. First, it would reset rents that are often so far below market that owners currently are better off leaving the apartments vacant. This should reverse the current trend undertaken by landlords of “warehousing” rent stabilized apartments once they become vacant. Second, the law would incentivize owners to renovate units that, in some cases, haven’t been renovated for a decade or longer and have fallen into disrepair.

In many ways, this proposal isn’t dissimilar to what happens when a rent controlled tenant vacates a unit and the unit becomes rent stabilized with the new tenant paying what is often referred to as a “first rent.” The rent tends to be at a market rate level though technically the apartment remains rent stabilized. So, the reset in rents would result in a sizeable increase from where it was but then settle back into a 1%-3% annual increase thereafter as governed by the Rent Guidelines Board.

This law, if enacted, would be one of the first compromises between landlords and rent stabilized tenants in quite some time where both sides benefit from the outcome. Can this possibly be in the words of Humphrey Bogart “the beginning of a beautiful friendship” among tenant advocacy groups, landlords and legislators in Albany? I am not so sure but it would be a good start. 

Website Source:
Rebong, K. (2024, January 11). The Daily Dirt: Lesser-known housing bills to watch. The Real Deal. https://therealdeal.com/new-york/2024/01/11/new-york-housing-bills-to-watch-in-2024-the-daily-dirt/
1
Leave a Comment

The Future of Macy’s is in Question

Department stores have been under threat for some time now as shoppers shift to discount stores, fast-fashion retailers, and buying directly from brands that have opened their own retail stores or newly launched websites. Several household names are struggling including Kohl’s, JC Penney, Saks Fifth Avenue, and Neiman Marcus, among others. But it is Macy’s that recently made the headlines.

Investors are Circling Macy’s and Its Assets

Macy’s (and Bloomingdales which it owns) may be the next major department store to disappear as two investor groups, Arkhouse Management and Brigade Capital Management, submitted a buyout proposal of approximately $5.8 billion or $21 per share, a 32% premium at the time of the offer. It isn’t clear what the investment groups, if successful, intend to do with the company i.e., keep it as a going concern or sell off all or some of the real estate assets. The question is meaningful as Macy’s remains among the world’s largest department-store chains with more than 94,000 employees and countless suppliers—all of whom would be impacted by store closures. With 783 stores, the malls that house these stores would also be affected by any major change to its operations.

But with “years of chronic underperformance,” according to one industry insider, Macy’s real estate may be worth more than its retail business. Net sales for the first nine months of 2023 declined by approximately 8% compared to the same period in 2019 (pre-pandemic) and profit has declined by 22%. To state the obvious, this is not good and directionally not where the retailer wants to be going. 

The Crown Jewel is the Real Estate Portfolio

Many national retail chains rent—and don’t own—the stores where they operate. Macy’s, on the other hand, owns more than 300 of its locations and investors believe the stores are as valuable as the retail business and perhaps even more so.

Certain estimates put the real estate portfolio at $6 billion with the managing director of the research firm, GlobalData, saying its “real estate is the jewel.” But real estate values like these where the end-user occupant is also the owner are never easy to underwrite. Typically an end user pays a premium above and beyond what a traditional investor would pay who looks at value based solely on the current or potential income. It is also worth noting that capitalization rates—the standard metric for valuing income producing properties—have increased substantially since the Fed began increasing rates but are expected to decline as the Fed begins cutting rates in 2024. Lower capitalization rates mean high asset values. That said, this may arguably be the ideal time to acquire Macy’s for its real estate portfolio.

Things are never so simple, however. Each Macy’s-owned property requires thorough due diligence as certain locations have deed restrictions that could hinder the development or re-purposing of these assets. Zoning issues as well could impact value. Another critical issue is understanding the value of Macy’s flagship New York store in Herald Square which is estimated to account for about a fifth of the value of the total real-estate portfolio, or $1.2 billion. Do you sell off all the other assets and keep the flagship store or do the opposite?

In short, Macy’s real estate assets are unquestionably quite valuable but how much specifically requires a deep dive by attorneys and other specialists to ascertain the impact of deed restrictions and zoning issues. No doubt something Arkhouse Management and Brigade Capital Management took into account.

Past Acquisitions by Activist Investors Didn’t Bode Well for the Targets

A quick revisit of similar transactions from the past should worry Macy’s executives and equity investors may want to make use of the few remaining lifeboats and get out with the recent increase in the stock price in case the deal ultimately sours along with the stock price.

One approach the prospective Macy’s investors may pursue is a sale-leaseback where they sell off the real estate but keep Macy’s as the tenant. A higher rent paid by Macy’s would be good for the sale of the real estate but more burdensome for the retail business. Private-equity firms that bought Mervyn’s, a now defunct department-store chain, split the business into an operating company and a property company and pursued a sale-leaseback structure. The economy teetered into recession and the company went out of business in 2008.

The hedge-fund manager Eddie Lampert bought Sears and sold off its real estate and invested very little into the retail operations. Today, Sears is a shell of its former self with just a handful of stores, down from thousands at its peak.

Is it the End of Macy’s

The fate of Macy’s is still up in the air but its demise would be disheartening especially if the perennial Thanksgiving Day Parade disappears. The first parade took place in 1924 (this year would mark the 100th anniversary) and it was first televised on NBC in 1953 and my mother was in attendance.  But perhaps like a good Nick Cave murder ballad, “all beauty must die.”

Website Source:
Kapner, S. (2023, December 12). Macy’s $5.8 Billion Question: What’s More Valuable, Real Estate or the Business? WSJ. https://www.wsj.com/business/retail/macys-billion-dollar-question-whats-more-valuable-real-estate-or-the-business-e6477c8e?mod=hp_listb_pos1
Leave a Comment